4.5 Article

Effects of L-DOPA on quadripulse magnetic stimulation-induced long-term potentiation in older adults

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 217-224

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.005

关键词

Aging; Plasticity; Dopamine; Primary motor cortex; TMS; Human

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26461308, 17K09809, 25293206, 22390181, 16H05322, 16K09709, 16H01497, 22590954]
  2. Catecholamine and the Neurological Disorders Symposium
  3. Magnetic Health Science Foundation
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [15H05881]
  5. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461308, 17K09809] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reduced cortical plasticity has been previously reported in older adult as compared with young adults. However, the effects of dopamine on this plasticity reduction remain unknown. Here, we assessed the effects of high-dose (200 mg) and medium-dose (100 mg) L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) intake on the long-term potentiation (LTP)-like effect induced by quadripulse magnetic stimulation (QPS) in older adults (aged similar to 65 years). The subjects were 32 (200 mg) and 20 (100 mg) healthy older adult volunteers. This study was designed as a double-blind, crossover and placebo-controlled trial on one dose of L-dopa. Two hours after taking L-DOPA or placebo-drug, QPS was applied over the motor cortex. Motor evoked potentials were recorded to evaluate the motor cortical excitability changes. We found that both doses of L-DOPA enhanced LTP after QPS in older adults as one group. We classified subjects into QPS responders and QPS nonresponders. Both L-DOPA doses produced significant LTP enhancement in QPS nonresponders, whereas either of doses did not produce significant LTP enhancement in QPS responders. Collectively, our findings suggest that the neural plasticity reductions observed in older adults could be partly improved by dopamine. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据