4.8 Review

Emerging connections between RNA and autophagy

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 3-23

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1222992

关键词

autophagy; granulophagy; noncoding RNA; ribophagy; RNA-binding proteins; RNA degradation

资金

  1. European Union under REA [607720]
  2. EU COST action Transautophagy [CA 15138]
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  5. Lundbeck Foundation
  6. Danish Cancer Society
  7. Lundbeck Foundation [R100-2011-8756] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. The Danish Cancer Society [R72-A4642] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macroautophagy/autophagy is a key catabolic process, essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and survival through the removal and recycling of unwanted cellular material. Emerging evidence has revealed intricate connections between the RNA and autophagy research fields. While a majority of studies have focused on protein, lipid and carbohydrate catabolism via autophagy, accumulating data supports the view that several types of RNA and associated ribonucleoprotein complexes are specifically recruited to phagophores (precursors to autophagosomes) and subsequently degraded in the lysosome/vacuole. Moreover, recent studies have revealed a substantial number of novel autophagy regulators with RNA-related functions, indicating roles for RNA and associated proteins not only as cargo, but also as regulators of this process. In this review, we discuss widespread evidence of RNA catabolism via autophagy in yeast, plants and animals, reviewing the molecular mechanisms and biological importance in normal physiology, stress and disease. In addition, we explore emerging evidence of core autophagy regulation mediated by RNA-binding proteins and noncoding RNAs, and point to gaps in our current knowledge of the connection between RNA and autophagy. Finally, we discuss the pathological implications of RNA-protein aggregation, primarily in the context of neurodegenerative disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据