4.6 Article

Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 703-715

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Department of Defence and Department of Veterans
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health
  3. National Centre for Research Resources
  4. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund
  5. Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering
  6. Clinical and Translational Science Award Program (CTSA) at Case Western Reserve University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past decade, advances in precision oncology have resulted in an increased demand for predictive assays that enable the selection and stratification of patients for treatment. The enormous divergence of signalling and transcriptional networks mediating the crosstalk between cancer, stromal and immune cells complicates the development of functionally relevant biomarkers based on a single gene or protein. However, the result of these complex processes can be uniquely captured in the morphometric features of stained tissue specimens. The possibility of digitizing whole-slide images of tissue has led to the advent of artificial intelligence (Al) and machine learning tools in digital pathology, which enable mining of subvisual morphometric phenotypes and might, ultimately, improve patient management. In this Perspective, we critically evaluate various AI-based computational approaches for digital pathology, focusing on deep neural networks and 'hand-crafted' feature-based methodologies. We aim to provide a broad framework for incorporating Al and machine learning tools into clinical oncology, with an emphasis on biomarker development. We discuss some of the challenges relating to the use of Al, including the need for well-curated validation datasets, regulatory approval and fair reimbursement strategies. Finally, we present potential future opportunities for precision oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据