4.8 Article

Genome architecture and stability in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae knockout collection

期刊

NATURE
卷 573, 期 7774, 页码 416-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1549-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome [101126/Z/13/Z, 206388/Z/17/Z, 098051, WT203144]
  2. Cancer Research UK [C6/A18796, C6946/A24843]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM118172]
  4. Wellcome Trust [101126/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite major progress in defining the functional roles of genes, a complete understanding of their influences is far from being realized, even in relatively simple organisms. A major milestone in this direction arose via the completion of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-knockout collection (YKOC), which has enabled high-throughput reverse genetics, phenotypic screenings and analyses of synthetic-genetic interactions(1-3). Ensuing experimental work has also highlighted some inconsistencies and mistakes in the YKOC, or genome instability events that rebalance the effects of specific knockouts(4-6), but a complete overview of these is lacking. The identification and analysis of genes that are required for maintaining genomic stability have traditionally relied on reporter assays and on the study of deletions of individual genes, but whole-genome-sequencing technologies now enable-in principle-the direct observation of genome instability globally and at scale. To exploit this opportunity, we sequenced the whole genomes of nearly all of the 4,732 strains comprising the homozygous diploid YKOC. Here, by extracting information on copy-number variation of tandem and interspersed repetitive DNA elements, we describe-for almost every single non-essential gene-the genomic alterations that are induced by its loss. Analysis of this dataset reveals genes that affect the maintenance of various genomic elements, highlights cross-talks between nuclear and mitochondrial genome stability, and shows how strains have genetically adapted to life in the absence of individual non-essential genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据