4.6 Article

Insight into the PTP1B Inhibitory Activity of Arylbenzofurans: An In Vitro and In Silico Study

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 24, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24162893

关键词

2-arylbenzofurans; PTP1B; T2DM; in silico studies

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2017R1A2B4005845]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4005845] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) plays a specific role as a negative regulator of insulin signaling pathways and is a validated therapeutic target for Type 2 diabetes. Previously, arylbenzofurans were reported to have inhibitory activity against PTP1B. However, detailed investigation regarding their structure activity relationship (SAR) has not been elucidated. The main aim of this work was to investigate the PTP1B inhibitory activity of 2-arylbenzofuran analogs (sanggenofuran A (SA), mulberrofuran D2 (MD2), mulberrofuran D (MD), morusalfuran B (MB), mulberrofuran H (MH)) isolated from the root bark of Morus alba. All compounds demonstrated potent inhibitory activity with IC50 values ranging from 3.11 to 53.47 mu M. Among the tested compounds, MD2 showed the strongest activity (IC50, 3.11 mu M), followed by MD and MB, while SA and MH demonstrated the lowest activity. Lineweaver-Burk and Dixon plots were used for the determination of inhibition type whereas ligand and receptor interactions were investigated in modeled complexes via molecular docking. Our study clearly supports 2-arylbenzofuran analogs as a promising class of PTP1B inhibitors and illustrates the key positions responsible for the inhibitory activity, their correlation, the effect of prenyl/geranyl groups, and the influence of resorcinol scaffold, which can be further explored in-depth to develop therapeutic agents against T2DM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据