4.7 Article

Optimal design of truss structures with frequency constraints using improved differential evolution algorithm based on an adaptive mutation scheme

期刊

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 81-94

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.004

关键词

Structural optimization; Differential evolution (DE); Improved differential evolution (IDE); Frequency constraints; Adaptive mutation scheme; Elitist selection technique; Nonlinear optimization problem

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science AMP
  2. Technology Development (NAFOSTED) [107.99-2014.11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents an improved differential evolution (IDE) and its application for solving shape and size optimization problems of truss structures with frequency constraints. The improvements are made in mutation and selection phases but mainly focused on the mutation phase. In the mutation phase of the IDE, a new selection scheme is proposed by using multi-mutation operators that adaptively employ all four popular mutation operators, including rand/1, rand/2, best/1, and best/2 for selecting target vectors in population. This new scheme helps maintain effectively the balance between the global exploration and local exploitation abilities for searching process of the DE. In the selection phase of the IDE, an elitist selection technique that helps save good individuals for the next generation is suggested to replace traditional selection technique of the original DE. The suggested technique can help increase the convergence rate-of the IDE. The efficiency and robustness of the IDE are demonstrated through five benchmark problems. Numerical results show that in most of the cases considered, the optimum design obtained by the IDE and DE are nearly the same and they are better than those gained by some other well-known methods in the literature. However, the IDE is much better than the DE in terms of the computational cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据