4.7 Article

Accumulation of Dietary S-Methyl Cysteine Sulfoxide in Human Prostate Tissue

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201900461

关键词

broccoli; cancer; glucosinolates; prostate; S-methyl cysteine sulfoxide

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Norfolk BigC cancer charity
  3. Prostate Cancer Foundation [Challenge Award]
  4. BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Food Innovation and Health [BB/R012512/1, BBS/E/F/000PR10343]
  5. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/000PR10343, BBS/E/F/000PR10347] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope Observational studies have associated consumption of cruciferous vegetables with reduced risk of prostate cancer. This effect has been associated with the degradation products of glucosinolates-thioglycosides that accumulate within crucifers. The possible role of S-methyl cysteine sulfoxide, a metabolite that also accumulates in cruciferous vegetables, and its derivatives, in cancer prevention is relatively unexplored compared to glucosinolate derivatives. The hypothesis that consuming a broccoli soup results in the accumulation of sulfate (a SMCSO derivative) and other broccoli-derived metabolites in prostate tissue is tested. Methods and results Eighteen men scheduled for transperineal prostate biopsy were recruited into a 4-week parallel single blinded diet supplementation study (NCT02821728). Nine men supplemented their diet with three 300 mL portions of a broccoli soup each week for four weeks prior to surgery. Analyses of prostate biopsy tissues reveal no detectable levels of glucosinolates and derivatives. In contrast, SMCSO is detected in prostate tissues of the participants, with significantly higher levels in tissue of men in the supplementation arm. SMCSO was also found in blood and urine samples from a previous intervention study with the identical broccoli soup. Conclusion The consequences of SMCSO accumulation in prostate tissues and its potential role in prevention of prostate cancer remains to be investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据