4.5 Article

LAPTM5 is transactivated by RUNX2 and involved in RANKL trafficking in osteoblastic cells

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 4193-4201

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10688

关键词

lysosomal-associated transmembrane protein 5; runt-related transcription factor 2; tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 11; osteoblast; osteoclast

资金

  1. Science Foundation for the Youth Scholars of Southern Medical University [PY2015N018]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271187]
  3. Science & Technology Projects of Guangzhou [201707010199]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Science & Technology Projects [2013B021800319, 2014A020212239, 2017A020215050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study aimed to investigate the role of lysosomal-associated transmembrane protein 5 (LAPTM5) in osteoclast differentiation induced by osteoblasts. The results demonstrated that the expression levels of LAPTM5 were downregulated following runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) silencing and upregulated following RUNX2 overexpression in ST2 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis identified the binding of RUNX2 to the LAPTM5 promoter at the -1176 to -1171 position. Dual-luciferase reporter assays confirmed that RUNX2 directly activated the LAPTM5 gene. The concentration of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) protein in the cytoplasm and in the media was significantly increased following LAPTM5 knockdown. LAPTM5 silencing in ST2 cells enhanced osteoclastic differentiation of co-cultured RAW264.7 cells. The present study indicated that expression of LAPTM5 was regulated by the interaction of RUNX2 with its promoter region and that LAPTM5 was involved in the trafficking of RANKL. These findings suggested a possible coupling mechanism between osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in which RUNX2 may be involved in osteoclast differentiation through the regulation of the lysosome-associated genes that modulate RANKL expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据