4.8 Article

RNA 5-Methylcytosine Facilitates the Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition by Preventing Maternal mRNA Decay

期刊

MOLECULAR CELL
卷 75, 期 6, 页码 1188-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.033

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [31625016]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [XDA16000000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31830061, 31230041]
  4. CAS Key Research Projects of the Frontier Science [QYZDY-SSW-SMC027]
  5. National Key RAMP
  6. D Program of China, Stem Cell and Translational Research [2018YFA0109700]
  7. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2018133, 2016097]
  8. K. C. Wong Education Foundation, Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2017SHZDZX01]
  9. NSFC [91753000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maternal-to-zygotic transition (MZT) is a conserved and fundamental process during which the maternal environment is converted to an environment of embryonic-driven development through dramatic reprogramming. However, how maternally supplied transcripts are dynamically regulated during MZT remains largely unknown. Herein, through genome-wide profiling of RNA 5-methylcytosine (m(5)C) modification in zebrafish early embryos, we found that m(5)C-modified maternal mRNAs display higher stability than non-m(5)C-modified mRNAs during MZT. We discovered that Y-box binding protein 1 (Ybx1) preferentially recognizes m(5)C--modified mRNAs through pi-pi interactions with a key residue, Trp45, in Ybx1's cold shock domain (CSD), which plays essential roles in maternal mRNA stability and early embryogenesis of zebrafish. Together with the mRNA stabilizer Pabpc1a, Ybx1 promotes the stability of its target mRNAs in an m(5)C-dependent manner. Our study demonstrates an unexpected mechanism of RNA m(5)C-regulated maternal mRNA stabilization during zebrafish MZT, highlighting the critical role of m(5)C mRNA modification in early development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据