4.6 Article

Microvesicle-Mediated Delivery of Minicircle DNA Results in Effective Gene-Directed Enzyme Prodrug Cancer Therapy

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 2331-2342

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0299

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [1UH2TR000902-01]
  2. Child Health Research Institute at Stanford University
  3. Michigan State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An emerging approach for cancer treatment employs the use of extracellular vesides, specifically exosomes and microvesides, as delivery vehides. We previously demonstrated that microvesides can functionally deliver plasmid DNA to cells and showed that plasmid size and sequence, in part, determine the delivery efficiency. In this study, delivery vehicles comprised of microvesides loaded with engineered minicirde (MC) DNA that encodes prodrug converting enzymes developed as a cancer therapy in mammary carcinoma models. We demonstrated that MCs can be loaded into shed microvesicles with greater efficiency than their parental plasmid counterparts and that midoveside-mediated MC delivery led to significantly higher and more prolonged transgene expression in recipient cells than microvesicles loaded with the parental plasmid. Microvesides loaded with MCs encoding a thymidine kinase (TK)/nitroreductase (NPR) fusion protein produced prolonged TK-NTR expression in mammary carcinoma cells. In vivo delivery of TK-NTR and administration of prodrugs led to the effective killing of both targeted cells and surrounding tumor cells via TK-NTR-mediated conversion of codelivered prodrugs into active cytotoxic agents. In vivo evaluation of the bystander effect in mouse models demonstrated that for effective therapy, at least 1% of tumor cells need to be delivered with TK-NTR-encoding MCs. These results suggest that MC delivery via microvesides can mediate gene transfer to an extent that enables effective prodrug conversion and tumor cell death such that it comprises a promising approach to cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据