4.7 Article

Nitrogen-doped carbon dots as a ratiometric fluorescent probe for determination of the activity of acid phosphatase, for inhibitor screening, and for intracellular imaging

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 186, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3600-9

关键词

Fluorescence; Lotus leaf; Ethylenediamine; Sodium hexametaphosphate; Aggregation-induced quenching; Electrostatic interactions; Enzymatic hydrolysis; ACP inhibitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775023, 81703477]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2016J01368]
  3. Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province [2016Y9055, 2017Y9124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The author describe a method for preparation of green fluorescent nitrogen-doped carbon dots (N-CDs) through hydrothermal treatment of a mixture of lotus leaf juice and ethylenediamine (EDA). The N-CDs have uniform size, good dispersibility and water solubility. Under 316 and 366nm photoexcitation, they show dual fluorescence with emission peaks at 415 and 509nm, respectively. They are positively charge and display low cytotoxicity. This makes them an excellent choice for fluorometric assays and for bioimaging. A ratiometric assay was developed for the determination of the activity of acid phosphatase (ACP). It is based on the aggregation- induced quenching (AIQ) of the fluorescence of the N-CDs by sodium hexametaphosphate (NaPO3)(6). Enzymatic hydrolysis of (NaPO3)(6) by ACP leads to the disintegration of (NaPO3)(6) and to the restoration of fluorescence. The measurement of the ratio of fluorescence at two wavelengths (415 and 509nm), background interference and fluctuating signals can be widely eliminated. The method works in the 1-50UL(-1) ACP activity range and has a detection limit of 0.43UL(-1). It was successfully applied (a) to the determination of ACP in spiked serum samples, (b) to ACP inhibitor screening, and (c) to imaging of ACP in HePG2 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据