4.6 Article

Complement mediated Klebsiella pneumoniae capsule changes

期刊

MICROBES AND INFECTION
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 19-30

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2019.08.003

关键词

Klebsiella pneumoniae; Bacterial capsules; Complement system; Membrane attack complex; Serum resistance

资金

  1. Obel Family Foundation
  2. Hertha Christensen Foundation
  3. Aase and Ejner Danielsen Foundation
  4. Joint Strategic Research Programme on Fighting antibiotic Resistance (Aalborg University and University of Southern Denmark)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gram-negative bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae is an opportunistic pathogen, which can cause life-threatening infections such as sepsis. Worldwide, emerging multidrug resistant K. pneumoniae infections are challenging to treat, hence leading to increased mortality. Therefore, understanding the interactions between K. pneumoniae and the immune system is important to develop new treatment options. We characterized ten clinical K. pneumoniae isolates obtained from blood of bacteremia patients. The interaction of the isolates with human serum was investigated to elucidate how K. pneumoniae escapes the host immune system, and how complement activation by K. pneumoniae changed the capsule structure. All K. pneumoniae isolates activated the alternative complement pathway despite serum resistance of seven isolates. One serum sensitive isolate activated two or all three pathways, and this isolate was lysed and had numerous membrane attack complexes in the outer membrane. However, we also found deposition of complement components in the capsule of serum resistant isolates resulting in morphological capsule changes and capsule shedding. These bacteria did not lyse, and no membrane attack complex was observed despite deposition of C5b-9 within the capsule, indicating that the capsule of serum resistant K. pneumoniae isolates is a defense mechanism against complement-mediated lysis. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Institut Pasteur.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据