4.7 Article

Gene silencing with CRISPRi in bacteria and optimization of dCas9 expression levels

期刊

METHODS
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 61-75

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.07.024

关键词

CRISPRi; dCas9; Knockdown; Gene silencing; Staphylococcus aureus; Escherichia coli

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the Europe Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [677823]
  2. French Government's Investissement d'Avenir program
  3. Laboratoire d'Excellence `Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases' [ANR-10-LABX62-IBEID]
  4. Pasteur-Weizmann consortium
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [677823] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic null mutant of the Cas9 endonuclease from the bacterial CRISPR immune system, known as dCas9, can be guided by a small RNA to bind DNA sequences of interest and block gene transcription in a strategy known as CRISPRi. This powerful gene silencing method has already been used in a large number of species and in high throughput screens. Here we provide detailed design rules, methods and novel vectors to perform CRISPRi experiments in S. aureus and in E. coli, using the well characterized dCas9 protein from S. pyogenes. In particular, we describe a vector based on plasmid pC194 which is broadly used in Firmicutes, as well as a vector based on the very broad host-range rolling circle plasmid pLZ12, reported to replicate in both Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. A potential caveat of adapting dCas9 tools to various bacterial species is that dCas9 was shown to be toxic when expressed too strongly. We describe a method to optimize the expression level of dCas9 in order to avoid toxicity while ensuring strong on-target repression activity. We demonstrate this method by optimizing a pLZ12 based vector originally developed for S. aureus so that it can work in E. colt. This article should provide all the resources required to perform CRISPRi experiments in a broad range of bacterial species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据