4.6 Article

Microstructure Analysis and Thermal Characteristics of NiTiHf Shape Memory Alloy with Different Composition

期刊

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 767-778

出版社

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-019-00444-7

关键词

Shape memory alloy; NiTiHf; Thermal analysis; Microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving the microstructural analysis of shape memory alloys, particularly NiTiHf alloys, is crucial for various applications. Adding more hafnium in NiTiHf alloys can increase phase transformation temperatures but decrease enthalpy change for endo/exothermic processes. Oxidation studies reveal different microstructures, such as needle-like shapes and plate-like Ti-rich microstructures, depending on the composition of Ni and Hf elements in the alloys.
Improving shape memory alloys in term of microstructural analysis is important for some related applications. In this study, three different NiTiHf shape memory alloys were produced from high pure elements and by utilizing arc-melting device. The morphologies of different precipitations and microstructures were analyzed by optical microscope, mapping, and EDX compositional analysis. The DSC measurements showed that the phase transformation temperatures is increased by adding more hafnium instead of nickel content in NiTiHf alloy, however, the enthalpy change for both endo/exothermic process were decreased. Also, XRD analysis has been carried out for all alloys to find different phases, and to obtain grain size as a function of different composition of Ni and Hf elements. The oxidation shows that titanium dioxide (TiO2) is spread out over the surface, but the microstructures are completely different for each case, e.g. needle-like shapes (nanorods) has extended over the surface of Alloy A with 3 at% Hf, but plate-like Ti-rich microstructures is dominated on the surface of Alloy B that has twice as more Hf as Alloy A; on the other hand, Alloy C with 9 at% Hf has some precipitates with TiO phase. Graphic

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据