4.2 Article

Information-measuring System to Study the Thermocouple with Controlled Temperature Field

期刊

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 161-169

出版社

SCIENDO
DOI: 10.2478/msr-2019-0022

关键词

Temperature; temperature measurement; thermocouple; thermocouple with controlled temperature field; error due to inhomogeneity

资金

  1. Lublin University of Technology - Regional Excellence Initiative - Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [030/RID/2018/19]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine [0119U100435]
  3. Doctoral Scientific Research Fund from Hubei University ofTechnology [BSQD14037]
  4. Green Industry Technology Leading Project of Hubei University of Technology [ZZTS2016004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Error due to inhomogeneity is the main problem of thermocouples (TCs), e.g., during the operation of a type K TC, this error can reach 11-30 degrees C. Thus, metrological reliability of TCs is threatened by this error because there is a high risk of exceeding the permissible error when the temperature distribution along the TC legs changes. Such a large error, in turn, can threaten a proper operation or even safety of a measured object. A TC with controlled temperature field was proposed to cope with this error. An information-measuring system to perform proper measurements, measurement data acquisition and collection to construct mathematical models is proposed. Its property is high diurnal stability of +/-(0.0025+0,002(X/X-MAX-1) %. The requirements for the information-measuring system and its structure are considered in this paper. In particular, one of the key problems of such a sensor is how stable is its own temperature field under the influence of the temperature field of a measured object. The experimental studies were carried out using the developed system. They showed that the coefficient of penetration of the temperature field of the measured object is about 0.04. This allows decreasing error due to inhomogeneity by about 10-20 times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据