4.6 Review

Risk of thrombosis in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 203-209

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.11.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Toulouse
  2. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are common in ITP, but their role for the occurrence of ITP-related thrombosis is controversial. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to investigate the risk of thrombosis associated with lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta(2)GP-I antibodies in primary ITP. The literature search was run on Medline, Cochrane and ISI Web of Science from January 1st 1980 to December 31st 2014. Unpublished studies were searched in meeting abstracts. The main analysis assessed the risk of all thromboses (arterial or venous) associated with the presence of LA, aCL or anti-beta(2)GP-I antibodies. Random-effect models were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Searches in electronic databases retrieved 776 citations. Twelve additional studies from unpublished literature were added. Eventually, 10 cohort studies totalizing 1574 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled OR for the risk of all thromboses associated with LA was 6.11, 95% CI [3.40-10.99]; it was 2.14, 95% CI [1.11-4.12] with aCL. The ORs were similar when stratifying on the type of thrombosis (arterial vs. venous). Only two studies assessed the risk of thrombosis associated with anti-beta(2)GP-I antibody positivity; consequently, no pooled OR was computed for these antibodies. This meta-analysis highly suggests that LA positivity, and to a less extent aCL antibodies, are associated with an enhanced risk of thrombosis in primary ITP patients. Further prospective studies are needed to identify the factors associated with the risk of thrombosis among LA patients before assessing prevention strategies. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据