4.7 Article

Effects of high-intensity ultrasound on the microstructures and mechanical properties of ultra-large 2219 Al alloy ingot

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138154

关键词

Ultra-large Al alloy ingot; Ultrasonic treatment; Microstructural refinement; Eutectic networks; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1637601, 51575539]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Proince, China [2019JJ50807]
  3. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing of Central South University [ZZYJKT2017-01]
  4. Project of Innovation-Driven Plan for Postgraduate in Central South University [2017zzts104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microstructural refinement of ultra-large 2219 Al alloy ingot is particularly important towards improving the corresponding mechanical properties for special industry application. Combined with the direct-chill casting, scalable high-intensity ultrasonic melt treatment (USMT) technique was applied to manufacture the ultra-large 2219 Al alloy cylindrical ingot (1380 mm in diameter and 4600 mm in length) in the present work. Then, the effects of USMT on the major microstructural constituents (i.e. primary alpha-Al grains, eutectic networks and precipitating particles) were investigated accordingly. The industry-level experiments showed that the major microstructural constituents were modified after introducing ultrasound. The primary alpha-Al phase was refined from the center part to the edge part compared with the ingot without USMT. The agglomeration of coarsening eutectic phase was mitigated and large lamellar eutectic networks became discontinuous from half radius to the edge part with USMT. Meanwhile, the mechanical properties of the solidified Al alloy ingots were also tested and compared between the samples with and without USMT. To reveal the modification of major microstructural constituents, the dominant mechanisms were proposed based on the ultrasonic cavitation and acoustic streaming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据