4.7 Article

Phase formation maps in Zr48Cu46.5Al4Nb1.5 bulk metallic glass composites as a function of cooling rate and oxygen concentration

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.109932

关键词

Bulk metallic glass composites; Oxygen; Cooling rate; synchrotron XRD; Rietveld refinement; TEM

资金

  1. Boeing Research & Technology Brazil (BRT-Brazil)
  2. Center for Advanced Non-Ferrous Structural Alloys (CANFSA), a National Science Foundation Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) at the Colorado School of Mines [1624836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A design of experiments (DoE) approach was employed to systematically characterize the effects of both oxygen concentration and cooling rate on the amorphous and crystalline phase fractions in the Zr48Cu46.5Al4Nb1.5 bulk metallic glass composite (BMGC) alloy. Specifically, four distinct oxygen concentrations and five distinct cooling rates were used. Phase quantification was achieved using Rietveld refinement of synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) data. Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) using wavelength dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) revealed that the big-cube crystalline phase may scavenge oxygen from the amorphous matrix of a 2864 +/- 47 wppm oxygen sample. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the alloy containing 340 +/- 25 wppm oxygen revealed the presence of an amorphous matrix with partially-transformed colonies of B2 (Pm-3m) where the transformation product was a B19' superstructure (Cm space group) instead of the more common B19' superstructure (P2(1)/m space group); this was in agreement with the Rietveld refinement results. An orientation relationship between the B2 and B19' phases was observed as expected. Finally, it was possible to produce thicker sections (5 mm vs. 3.5 mm) with the desired composite structure ( similar to 80% amorphous fraction with similar to 20% B2/ B19') compared with previous BMGC studies on similar compositions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据