4.5 Article

MR fingerprinting for water T1 and fat fraction quantification in fat infiltrated skeletal muscles

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 621-634

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27960

关键词

fat fraction; MRF; MRI; skeletal muscle; water T1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To develop a fast MR fingerprinting (MRF) sequence for simultaneous estimation of water T1 (T1(H2O)) and fat fraction (FF) in fat infiltrated skeletal muscles. Methods The MRF sequence for T1(H2O) and FF quantification (MRF T1-FF) comprises a 1400 radial spokes echo train, following nonselective inversion, with varying echo and repetition time, as well as prescribed flip angle. Undersampled frames were reconstructed at different acquisition time-points by nonuniform Fourier transform, and a bi-component model based on Bloch simulations applied to adjust the signal evolution and extract T1(H2O) and FF. The sequence was validated on a multi-vial phantom, in three healthy volunteers and five patients with neuromuscular diseases. We evaluated the agreement between MRF T1-FF parameters and reference values and confounding effects due to B0 and B1 inhomogeneities. Results In phantom, T1(H2O) and FF were highly correlated with references values measured with multi-inversion time inversion recovery-stimulated echo acquisition mode and Dixon, respectively (R-2 > 0.99). In vivo, T1(H2O) and FF determined by the MRF T1-FF sequence were also correlated with reference values (R-2 = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively). The precision on T1(H2O) was better than 5% for muscles where FF was less than 0.4. Both T1(H2O) and FF values were not confounded by B0 nor B1 inhomogeneities. Conclusion The MRF T1-FF sequence derived T1(H2O) and FF values in voxels containing a mixture of water and fat protons. This method can be used to comprehend and characterize the effects of tissue water compartmentation and distribution on muscle T1 values in patients affected by chronic fat infiltration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据