4.7 Article

Quaternary Solar Cells with 12.5% Efficiency Enabled with Non-Fullerene and Fullerene Acceptor Guests to Improve Open Circuit Voltage and Film Morphology

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
卷 40, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.201900353

关键词

fullerenes; non-fullerene; quaternary solar cells; small molecule acceptors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [91433202, 21773262, 21327805, 91227112]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDB12010200]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (MOST) [2013CB933503]
  4. U.S. Office of Naval Research [N00014-15-1-2244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Designing the bulk-heterojunction structure (binary, ternary and quaternary) is of great fundamental interest for relaxing the trade-off between open circuit voltage (V-oc) and short circuit current density ( J(sc)). Herein, a new quaternary blended material system is reported with a nonfullerene and PC71BM as the third and fourth component of PBDB-T:ITCT, leading to simultaneously increased V-oc and J(sc) and maintained fill factor (FF). The guest IT-T-IC has upshifted LUMO energy level helping to obtain a higher V-oc. The further addition of 0.2 PC71BM as the fourth component yields an even higher V-oc because the LUMO of PC71BM is higher than that of ITCT. Interestingly, the blend of PC71BM leads to the formation of an unprecedented neuron-like morphology, which acts as new centers not only performing light absorption and charge separation but also charge transport through their surrounding donor and acceptor fibers. The increased hole and electron mobilities and the reduced bimolecular loss results in an even larger J(sc) and FF. These results indicate that a combination using a structurally similar higher-LUMO-level non-fullerene acceptor and PCBM is a simple yet effective quaternary material approach to simultaneously increase V-oc and J(sc) while maintaining FF, improving final device performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据