4.3 Article

Belimumab alters transitional B-cell subset proportions in patients with stable systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

LUPUS
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 1337-1343

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0961203319869468

关键词

Belimumab; transitional B cells; translational; systemic lupus erythematosus; human B-cell production

资金

  1. Transplantation Institute Loma Linda University Health Care
  2. Loma Linda University School of Medicine
  3. NIH [P20 MD006988, 2R25 GM060507]
  4. Bevra-Hahn Scholarship Award
  5. Loma Linda University School of Medicine-Rheumatology Division Research Endowment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:We evaluated the effects of the B-cell activating factor (BAFF)-targeting antibody Belimumab on human nonmemory B-cell pools. Human B-cell pools were identified using surface markers adapted from mouse studies that specifically assessed reductions in immature B cells due to BAFF depletion. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have high levels of both BAFF and immature B cells. Mechanistic mouse studies provide a framework for understanding human responses to therapies that target B cells. Methods:Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy donors and SLE patients on Belimumab or standard-of-care therapy (SCT). Cells were stained for flow cytometry to identify B-cell subsets based on CD21/CD24. Differences in subset proportions were determined by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test. Results:Patients treated with Belimumab show alterations in the nonmemory B-cell pool characterized by a decrease in the Transitional 2 (T2) subset (p = 0.002), and an increase in the proportion of Transitional 1 (T1) cells (p = 0.005) as compared with healthy donors and SCT patients. The naive B-cell compartment showed no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.293). Conclusion:Using a translational approach, we show that Belimumab-mediated BAFF depletion reduces the T2 subset in patients, similar to observations in mouse models with BAFF depletion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据