4.5 Article

Tunable self-organization in n-type liquid crystalline dibenzocoronene tetracarboxdiimides for high photoconductivity

期刊

LIQUID CRYSTALS
卷 47, 期 2, 页码 291-300

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2019.1645899

关键词

Low LUMO; high electron mobility; dibenzocoronene tetracarboxdiimides; n-type liquid crystalline semiconductor

资金

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China [2172024]
  2. Beijing Municipal Education Commission of China [04190117021, 04190117025]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21302012]
  4. Doctoral Program of Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [18zxxt04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive study on the self-organised mesomorphism and charge-transport properties of three n-type liquid crystalline (LC) dibenzocoronene tetracarboxdiimide derivatives (Dibenzo-CDI 1, 2, 3) bearing branched alkyl chains with varied side-chain length and branching point (alpha or beta site) has been carried out. All three Dibenzo-CDI compounds possessed high solubility in common organic solvents and low-lying lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels below -4.0 eV indicating their air-stable electron-transport capacity under ambient conditions. It is discovered that the side-chain length has a moderate influence on the molecular arrangement and thus leads to only limited variation of electron-transport properties. In contrast, the branching position plays a critical role on tuning molecular packing and orientation in the bulk mesophases, thereby resulting in dramatic differences in electron mobilities. Remarkably, Dibenzo-CDI 3 demonstrates good photoconductivity by time-of-flight method with high electron mobility up to 0.075 cm(2)/Vs, close to the highest value reported in certain n-type LC derivatives. All these results reveal that LC Dibenzo-CDI derivatives are potential candidates for high-performance solution-processable electronics, such as air-stable n-type organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) and solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据