4.5 Article

Separation and Identification of Glycan Anomers Using Ultrahigh-Resolution Ion-Mobility Spectrometry and Cryogenic Ion Spectroscopy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13361-019-02333-0

关键词

Glycans; Carbohydrates; Anomers; Glucose; Ion-mobility spectrometry; Ion spectroscopy; Mass spectrometry; SLIM

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_165908]
  2. European Research Council [788697-GLYCANAL]
  3. EPFL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of carbohydrates, or glycans, is challenging for established structure-sensitive gas-phase methods. The multitude of possible stereo-, regio-, and structural isomers makes them substantially more complex to analyze than DNA or proteins, and no one method is currently able to fully resolve them. While the combination of tandem mass spectrometry (MS) and ion-mobility spectrometry (IMS) have made important inroads in glycan analysis, in many cases, this approach is still not able to identify the precise isomeric form. To advance the techniques available for glycan analysis, we employ two important innovations. First, we perform ultrahigh-resolution mobility separation using structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM) for isomer separation and pre-selection. We then complement this IMS-MS stage with a cryogenic IR spectroscopic dimension since a glycan's vibrational spectrum provides a fingerprint that is extremely sensitive to the precise isomeric form. Using this unique approach in conjunction with oxygen-18 isotopic labeling, we show on a range of disaccharides how the two alpha and beta anomers that every reducing glycan adopts in solution can be readily separated by mobility and identified based on their IR spectra. In addition to highlighting the power of our technique to detect minute differences in the structure of isomeric carbohydrates, these results provide the means to determine if and when anomericity is retained during collision-induced dissociation (CID) of larger glycans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据