4.7 Article

Long-Term Results of Mitral Valve Repair for Regurgitation Due to Leaflet Prolapse

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 1044-1053

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.052

关键词

degenerative diseases of the mitral valve; mitral valve repair; mitral regurgitation

资金

  1. Academic Enrichment Fund of the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of Toronto General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Mitral valve (MV) repair has become the standard therapy for mitral regurgitation (MR) due to degenerative diseases, but information on late outcomes is limited. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to examine the late results of MV repair for MR in a large cohort of patients. METHODS A total of 1,234 consecutive patients (median age 59 years; 70.4% men) had MV repair for MR due to leaflet prolapse and were followed prospectively for a median of 13 years (interquartile range: 8 to 34 years) with periodical echocardiographic studies. There were 163 patients still at risk at 20 years. Cumulative incidences of adverse events and associated factors were examined with death as a competing outcome. RESULTS At 20 years, reoperation-free survival was 60.4% (95% confidence interval: 56.2% to 64.2%) and the cumulative incidence of cardiac and valve-related deaths was 12%, noncardiac deaths 21.3%, reoperation on the MV 4.6%, infective endocarditis 1.1%, thromboembolism 10.3%, and bleeding 6.4%. The probability of recurrent moderate or severe MR was 12.5%, persistent or new moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) 20.8%, and new atrial fibrillation (AF) 32.4%. Multivariable analysis identified older age, complete heart block, MV repair without annuloplasty ring, and the degree of myxomatous degeneration of the MV to be associated with recurrent MR. The development of AF and TR was unrelated to recurrent MR. CONCLUSIONS MV reoperation was uncommon after MV repair, but there was an increasing incidence of recurrent MR, TR, and new AF over time. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据