4.8 Article

Dynamic Protonation Dramatically Affects the Membrane Permeability of Drug-like Molecules

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 141, 期 34, 页码 13421-13433

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04387

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RO1 GM0S3148]
  2. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]
  3. University of Chicago Research Computing Center (RCC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Permeability (P-m) across biological membranes is of fundamental importance and a key factor in drug absorption, distribution, and development. Although the majority of drugs will be charged at some point during oral delivery, our understanding of membrane permeation by charged species is limited. The canonical model assumes that only neutral molecules partition into and passively permeate across membranes, but there is mounting evidence that these processes are also facile for certain charged species. However, it is unknown whether such ionizable permeants dynamically neutralize at the membrane surface or permeate in their charged form. To probe protonation-coupled permeation in atomic detail, we herein apply continuous constant-pH molecular dynamics along with free energy sampling to study the permeation of a weak base propranolol (PPL), and evaluate the impact of including dynamic protonation on P-m. The simulations reveal that PPL dynamically neutralizes at the lipid-tail interface, which dramatically influences the permeation free energy landscape and explains why the conventional model overestimates the assigned intrinsic permeability. We demonstrate how fixed-charge-state simulations can account for this effect, and propose a revised model that better describes pH-coupled partitioning and permeation. Our results demonstrate how dynamic changes in protonation state may play a critical role in the permeation of ionizable molecules, including pharmaceuticals and drug-like molecules, thus requiring a revision of the standard picture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据