4.6 Article

Outcomes and prognostic factors in African American and black patients with mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome: Retrospective analysis of 157 patients from a referral cancer center

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.073

关键词

African American; cutaneous lymphoma; hyperpigmented MF; hypopigmented MF; MF; racial disparity; skin of color; survival analysis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The prevalence of mycosis fungoides/S ezary syndrome (MF/SS) is higher in the black population than in the white population in the United States and worse outcomes have been observed in black patients. Objective: To describe the outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in African American and black patients with MF/SS. Methods: Clinical features and follow-up data were analyzed in 157 self-identified African American or black patients seen during 1994-2018. Results: We included 122 patients with early stage MF and 35 patients with advanced-stage disease (median follow-up of 25 months). Overall,[80% of the patients who died from disease or progressed had erythema or hyperpigmentation without hypopigmentation. Patients with hypopigmentation, either as the sole manifestation or in combination with other lesions, had better overall survival (P = .002) and progression-free survival (P = .014). Clinical stage, TNMB classification, plaque disease, and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase were also significantly associated with outcomes. Demographic and socioeconomic parameters were not associated with prognosis. Limitations: A retrospective study at a single cancer center. Conclusion: MF/SS manifestations and outcomes in African American and black patients are heterogeneous. Demographic and socioeconomic factors do not seem to have a prognostic role, while clinical characteristics might help in the stratification of risk of progression and shorter survival, allowing for individually tailored therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据