4.8 Article

Polydopamine-treated three-dimensional carbon fiber-coated separator for achieving high-performance lithium metal batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 430, 期 -, 页码 130-136

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.003

关键词

Vapor-grown carbon fiber; Li metal electrode; Polydopamine; Li dendrite; Dead li

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2018M3A7B4071066]
  2. Industrial Technology Innovation Project of Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology [20001370]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20001370] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of safe and high-performance lithium (Li) metal anodes has been a challenging issue that has not been addressed for decades. In this study, we have developed a thermally stable polydopamine-treated three-dimensional (3D) carbon fiber-coated separator (P3D-CFS) using an economical and environment-friendly process. P3D-CFS has a conductive coating layer that is used as a 3D hosting structure, which does not cause morphological changes in the Li metal anode. As a result, the unit cells (LiMn2O4/Li metal) employing P3D-CFS improve the cycle performance and rate capability compared to commercial polyethylene (PE) separators, P3D-CFS maintained 83.1% of the initial discharge capacity at the 400th cycle, whereas bare PE maintains only 74.3% of the initial discharge capacity after the 250th cycle (C/2 = 0.5 mA cm(-2)). P3D-CFS maintains 42.8% of the initial discharge capacity at a 7C rate (7 mA cm(-2)), whereas only 0.19% is maintained by bare PE under the same condition. Owing to the thermally stable properties of P3D-CFS, the open-circuit voltage of the unit cells (LiMn2O4/graphite) that employed P3D-CFS is maintained for over 60 min at 140 degrees C, whereas the unit cells that employed bare PE show a sudden voltage drop after only 3 min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据