4.8 Article

Ni(OH)2/NiMoO4 nanoplates for large-scale fully-printed flexible solid-state supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 433, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.05.082

关键词

Screen printing technology; Flexible energy storage system; Solid-state supercapacitors; Composite nanomaterials; Active electrodes

资金

  1. NSFC [51471121]
  2. Basic Research Plan Program of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20170303170426117]
  3. Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Program [2018GK2064]
  4. Research Plan Program of Changsha City [kq1804010]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042018kf203]
  6. Wuhan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing development demand of wearable electronics for intelligent life accelerates the studies and explorations on portable flexible energy storage system. However, how to achieve high performance power sources on a par with uncomplicated and high-efficient fabrication processes also is a huge challenge. Herein, Ni(OH)(2)/NiMoO4 composites with enhanced specific capacitance and cyclic lifespan are synthesized via a facile hydro thermal method. And the composites are used as functional inks for the fabrication of printed electrode of flexible solid-state supercapacitors. Large specific capacitance of 1547.3 F g(-1) is achieved by the composite electrode at 1 A g(-1). After charging and discharging 1000 times, 88.1% of the initial capacitance at 20 A g(-1) can be retained. Large-scale flexible solid-state supercapacitors are developed through fully screen printing technique in a very short time, which exhibit high stability (115% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles) and good flexibility (81.7% of capacitance remained after 750 bending/releasing cycles). Moreover, when three printed super capacitors are connected in series, a yellow light emitting diode (1.9 V) can be easily lighted up, which is preconceived to be a promising portable energy storage system in future wearable electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据