4.4 Article

Preparation and characterization of renewable composites from Polylactide and Rice husk for 3D printing applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF POLYMER RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10965-019-1882-6

关键词

Polylactide; Rice husk; 3D printing; Mechanical properties; Biodegradation

资金

  1. Wuliangye Group Co. Ltd. [CXY2019ZR001]
  2. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program [2019JDRC0029]
  3. Zigong City Science and Technology [2017XC16, 2019CXRC01]
  4. Opening Project of Material Corrosion, and the Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan province [2017CL03]
  5. Opening Project of Sichuan Provincial Key Lab of Process Equipment and Control, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering [2017RCL16, 2019RC05]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  7. Apex Nanotek Co. Ltd.
  8. Ratchadapisek Sompote Fund
  9. National Science Council (Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C.) [MOST 103-2622-E-244-001-CC3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blends of polylactide (PLA) and rice husk (RH) were prepared using a twin-screw extruder and characterized for mechanical properties, and microstructure. Scanning electron micrographs illustrated the occurrence of phase separation in PLA/RH blends, leading to poor tensile properties. To strengthen the blend mechanical properties, methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) was added as an interfacial compatibilizer, which would improve the tensile strength and notched Izod impact of the composites containing RH (20-50 wt%). A porous morphology showing several connected voids was observed on the surface of all PLA/RH and PLA/RH/MDI composites buried in soil for specific periods of time. The size of the voids considerably increased with the RH content. RH would be an excellent filler, compatibilized with MDI, to enhance the biodegradation and mechanical properties of the resultant environment-friendly composites for 3D printing applications. Graphical abstract Preparation of biodegradable composites from rice husk for 3D printing application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据