4.4 Article

Insights into Physiological Mechanisms of Salt Stress Tolerance in Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) Sprouts

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 263-273

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12374-019-0053-y

关键词

Antioxidant capacity; Chenopodium formosanum Koidz; Na+ and K+ content; Osmotic adjustment; Salt tolerance mechanism

资金

  1. College Agriculture, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change has led to sea level rise and the salinization of arable land in coastal areas, which has affected the production of crops. Chenopodium formosanum Koidz. (djulis) has high nutritional value in Taiwan; however, the salt tolerance mechanism of djulis remains unclear. Therefore, the physiological salt tolerance mechanism of djulis was investigated in this study, which found that after the djulis sprouts were treated with 400 mM NaCl for 5 d, their growth was inhibited; the survival rate decreased by 45%, and the plant height and dry weight decreased by 9% and 36%, respectively. The content of the superoxide anion reactive oxygen species decreased as the treatment duration increased, whereas the H2O2 content increased with the treatment duration. The activity of antioxidants, namely ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, glutathione reductase, and superoxide dismutase, gradually increased as the treatment duration increased; the ratios of ascorbic acid to docosahexaenoic acid and glutathione to oxidized glutathione also increased significantly. The content of proline increased with the treatment duration. Moreover, the K+ content increased as Na+ accumulated. Accordingly, this study determined 400 mM to be the NaCl threshold level for djulis. Under the salt stress at this NaCl level, the djulis transported Na+ from the roots to aboveground portion and stored it in salt bladders to alleviate the toxic damage of Na+. In addition, proline and K+ were accumulated to adjust the osmotic pressure of cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据