4.8 Article

Microscopic Origin of the Solid Electrolyte Interphase Formation in Fire-Extinguishing Electrolyte: Formation of Pure Inorganic Layer in High Salt Concentration

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 10, 期 19, 页码 5949-5955

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02392

关键词

-

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science Technology Agency (JST)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology (MEXT) in Japan
  3. MEXT program Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries (ESICB)
  4. MEXT program Priority Issue on Post-K computer (Development of new fundamental technologies for high-efficiency energy creation, conversion/storage and use)
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) as a JSPS Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research in Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly salt-concentrated (HC) electrolyte based on the nonflammable solvent trimethyl-phosphate (TMP) has recently shown an attractive self-extinguishing property in addition to an excellent charge-discharge performance. However, the microscopic understanding of its solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer remains an open question. In this Letter, the red moon (RM) method was used to investigate the molecular mechanism of SEI layer formation depending on lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)amide (LiFSA) salt concentration in a TMP-based electrolyte and was able to reproduce successfully the experimental observations, i.e., the bottom-up formation mechanism with a thinner and denser SEI layer mainly based on salt reduction in the HC electrolyte. The results showed that a pure dense inorganic layer is formed in the HC electrolyte, which should considerably improve the SEI layer stability leading to a longer lifetime in charge-discharge performance. This new microscopic finding should provide an important guide in designing an effective nonflammable electrolyte to develop advanced, safe secondary batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据