4.6 Article

Quantum Confinement Induced Excitonic Mechanism in Zinc-Oxide-Nanowalled Microrod Arrays for UV-Vis Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 123, 期 40, 页码 24957-24962

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07329

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2016RID1A1B01009032, NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025340]
  2. Global Research Laboratory Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [NRF-2015K1A1A2033332, NRF2015R1A5A1037627]
  3. Helmholtz Society through DESY, DFG (Deutsche Forschungs Gesellschaft) [RU773/8-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) in 4-mercaptopyridine (4-Mpy) deposited on zinc oxide (ZnO) nanostructures, by using resonance Raman scattering covering a range of incident photon energies from 1.7 to 5.7 eV. We investigated all primary routes of the energy-specific resonances that are associated with the electronic transitions between the ZnO valence band (VB) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the ZnO conduction band (CB), respectively. Two resonances at 5.55 and 5.15 eV in the ultraviolet (UV) spectral range can be associated with transitions into the CB and most importantly into an excitonic-related state below the ZnO CB, respectively. The energy difference between the UV resonances is 0.4 eV corresponding to the excitonic binding energy as a result of excitonic quantum confinement in the 10-20 nm thick ZnO nanowalls. The observed excitonic SERS resonance enhancement of the ring-breathing mode of 4-Mpy is about 15 times stronger than for the VB resonance observed at 2.43 eV and free of luminescence background. Hence, we outline new pathways of improving the detestability of molecules by chemical SERS due to tuning of the quantum confinement in the excitonic resonance enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据