4.6 Article

Maximizing Hydrogen Evolution Performance on Pt in Buffered Solutions: Mass Transfer Constrains of H2 and Buffer Ions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 123, 期 35, 页码 21554-21563

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05245

关键词

-

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) on a Pt electrode is among the most studied electrocatalytic reactions, its reaction mechanism and exchange current density are still under debate. Particularly on the Pt catalyst, its facile reaction kinetics and lack of effective methods to compensate mass transport make it difficult to isolate kinetic and diffusion contributions. This study focuses on the quantitative description of mass transfer constraints arising from both H-2 and phosphate buffer ions using a Pt electrocatalyst in near-neutral pH regions, which are overlooked in the literature despite the relevance to various (photo-) electrochemical reactions for water splitting and CO2 reduction. The established HER model that uses H+ as a reactant quantitatively breaks down the observed overpotentials with diffusion contributions of both hydrogen and buffer species while the intrinsic kinetics on Pt exhibits negligible contribution. The significance of electrolyte engineering, that is, the optimization of the electrolyte identity and molality, is confirmed to determine the overall HER performance. To maximize the HER performance on Pt at ambient temperature, the phosphate-buffer electrolyte should be adjusted to a pH close to pK(a) of the buffer that effectively minimizes the pH gradient and to the adequate molality of the buffer (typically similar to 0.5 M phosphates) that H-2 diffusion is maximized, which is related with H-2 solubility and solution viscosity. At pH far from pK(a), concentration overpotential of buffer ion dominates the overall performance, which requires highly dense buffer (>1.5 M phosphates) to minimize the pH gradient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据