4.5 Article

Interplay of Nanoparticle Rigidity and Its Translocation Ability through Cell Membrane

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 123, 期 42, 页码 8923-8930

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07452

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805414, 31741043]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LZ19A020002]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission [JCYJ20180306170652664]
  4. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1306065]
  5. University of Georgia (UGA)
  6. UGA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the endocytic process of nanoparticles (NPs) with different mechanical rigidities is critical to develop effective drug delivery vectors. Here, we perform experiments, coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, and theoretical analyses to investigate the role of NPs' mechanical rigidity in the cellular endocytic process. Experiments based on two types of engineered Au NPs that have similar properties but different rigidities are performed in order to investigate their cellular uptake efficiencies, and it has been found that the more rigid NPs can achieve a higher cellular uptake efficiency. Simulation results confirm that rigid NPs can achieve full internalization by forming a complete double-layer endosome coating, while relatively soft NPs can only reach 40% surface coverage by membrane lipids. Simulation results capture an intriguing translocation of multiple NPs with different rigidities in a cooperative manner where the NPs' mechanical rigidities regulate their translocation efficiencies. We find that theoretically rigid NPs require less energy to overcome the energy barrier for membrane internalization than soft NPs do, which is in good agreement with experiment and simulation results. This synergetic study offers useful insight into the design principle of a general NP-based drug delivery vector as well as the promising biomedical application of NP-based medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据