4.6 Article

Anti-diarrhea effects and identification of Musca domestica larvae low molecular weight peptides (LMWP)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.05.032

关键词

Musca domestica larvae; Anti-diarrhea; Intestinal microbiological; Identification

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2014A020212416]
  2. Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project, China [201707010132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Musca domestica larvae have been used clinically to cure children malnutritional stagnation and low molecular weight peptides (LMWP) of Musca domestica larvae showed more useful bioactivities. But there is no report on anti-diarrhea effects and identification of the LWMP. The purposes of this study were clarifying the anti-diarrhea effects by regulating intestinal microecology and identification of LMWP. In anti-diarrhea test, diarrhea mice were administered LMWP by oral gavage. Then rectal stool indicator bacteria were counted also the identification of rectal stool bacteria were determined by PCR-DGGE. In LMWP identification test, GFC and RP-I-IPLC were used to separate the peptide. Then the single polypeptide was tested by MALDI TOF and N-terminal sequence analysis. The results of anti-diarrhea showed that LMWP was effective in the inhibition diarrhea in mice. And microbial diversity indices showed that LMWP treatment group exhibited a higher number of bands. The identification test showed that LMWP had four main components (10-30KD, S1, S2, S3), and there were 5, 7 and 4 peaks in S1, S2 and S3, respectively. The the molecular weight of S2-5, S3-2 and S3-3 was 877.053D, 877.0631D and 1069.4391D, respectively. And S3-3 was determined as Chain A, Carboxypeptidase G2. So the hypothesis that intestinal microbiological regulation might be one of the potential anti-diarrhea mechanisms of Musca domestica larvae LMWP which had four main components and one of the single polypeptide was identified could be drawn. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据