4.1 Review

The Influence of Parents' Religiosity or Spirituality on Decision Making for Their Critically Ill Child: An Integrative Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 1455-1467

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0154

关键词

decision making; integrative review; intensive; critical care; spirituality

资金

  1. Rockefeller University Heilbrunn Family Center for Research Nursing
  2. Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing
  3. Eastern Nursing Research Society (ENRS)/Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science (CANS)
  4. Southern Nursing Research Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Religion and/or spirituality are important values for many parents of critically ill children; however, how religion and/or spirituality may influence which treatments parents accept or decline for their child, or how they respond to significant events during their child's illness treatment, remains unclear. Objective: To summarize the literature related to the influence of parents' religiosity or spirituality on decision making for their critically ill child. Design: Integrative review, using the Whittemore and Knafl approach. Setting/Subjects: Data were collected from studies identified through PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL plus), Embase, Scopus, and PsychInfo. Databases were searched to identify literature published between 1996 and 2016. Results: Twenty-four articles of variable methodological quality met inclusion criteria. Analysis generated three themes: parents' religiosity or spirituality as (1) guidance during decision making, (2) comfort and support during the decision-making process, and (3) a source of meaning, purpose, and connectedness in the experience of decision making. Conclusion: This review suggests that parents' religiosity and/or spirituality is an important and primarily positive influence on their decision making for a critically ill child.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据