4.2 Article

Modern-Day Relics of Psychiatry

期刊

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
卷 207, 期 9, 页码 701-704

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001059

关键词

History of psychiatry; homosexuality; draeptomania; hysteria; somatoform disorders; neurasthenia; chronic fatigue syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Constantly shifting cultural views influence public perceptions of psychiatric diagnoses, sometimes accommodated by changes in diagnostic terminology. Evolving scientific knowledge of the era is at times used to justify and support mental illnesses. Too often, however, remasked nomenclatures fail to alter social stigma, in part because political arguments are used. Scientific validations of variant behaviors as symptoms with a pathologic status are unfortunately overshadowed. Examples of cultural bias effects on recurring diagnostic challenges illustrate a need for scientific validation. Renaming fails to improve stigma or diagnostic clarity. For example, neurasthenia, or nervous exhaustion, was attributed to fast-paced urban life through the late 1970s. Its symptoms are now largely, to no real advantage, retitled as chronic fatigue syndrome. Diagnoses like hysteria have evolved into histrionic personality disorder and somatoform spectrum disorders, although less as a result of demonic possession or a wandering uterus. Decriminalized and depathologized homosexuality remains a political football, where religious sin conceptualizations have not been displaced by studies documenting healthy adjustments among groups with diverse sexual orientations and preferences. Each of these remains severely socially stigmatized. The pseudoscience of drapetomania, once used to rationalize and pathologize a slave's freedom, is perceived now as psychiatric incarcerations of mentally healthy individuals, more commonly in totalitarian regimes-a politicization of stigma. Research reviews and funding efforts need to emphasize a sound basis for individuals caught in perpetuated diagnostic challenges, not remedied by simple shifts in nomenclature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据