4.2 Article

Protective Effect of Cholic Acid-Coated Poly Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA) Nanoparticles Loaded with Erythropoietin on Experimental Stroke

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 10, 页码 6524-6533

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2019.17078

关键词

Poly Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA); Erythropoietin (EPO); Stroke; Blood-Brain Barrier; Apoptosis

资金

  1. Korea Research Foundation [NRF-2016R1C1B2012351, -2017R1C1B2006365, 2017R1A2B4005167]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B4005167, 2017R1C1B2006365] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stroke is a major cause of adult mortality and morbidity worldwide. However, the treatment of stroke using the vast majority of possible drug candidates, including erythropoietin (EPO), remains problematic because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), resulting in scarce penetration onto the brain. To overcome this, we synthesized a novel EPO delivery system, namely the cholic acid-coated poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles loaded with EPO (EPO-CA-NPs), with the aim of enabling efficient penetration of EPO-CA-NPs across the BBB. The therapeutic efficacy of EPO-CA-NPs on an animal model of stroke was compared with that of EPO. The experimental stroke model was produced by subjecting rats to the middle carotid artery occlusion and reperfusion (MCAO/R) technique. The results indicated that EPO-CA-NPs reduced the extent of the infarct volume and cellular apoptosis to a greater extent than EPO alone at postoperative day (POD) 1. Furthermore, EPO-CA-NPs showed better performance on sensorimotor functions than EPO alone at POD 1, 3, 5, and 7. Taken together, EPO-CA-NPs, a newly synthesized brain-targeted EPO-delivery system, has stronger therapeutic effects on stroke than EPO alone, by enabling efficient EPO delivery into the brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据