4.4 Article

Displacement characteristics and prediction of Baishuihe landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 2203-2214

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-019-5470-3

关键词

Landslide; Three Gorges Reservoir; Impoundment process; Displacement prediction

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0809400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41772310, 41842062]
  3. China Geological Survey Foundation [DD20190641]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to reach the designated final water level of 175 m, there were three impoundment stages in the Three Gorges Reservoir, with water levels of 135 m, 156 m and 175 m. Baishuihe landslide in the Reservoir was chosen to analyze its displacement characteristics and displacement variability at the different stages. Based on monitoring data, the landslide displacement was mainly influenced by rainfall and drawdown of the reservoir water level. However, the magnitude of the rise and drawdown of the water level after the reservoir water level reached 175 m did not accelerate landslide displacement. The prediction of landslide displacement for active landslides is very important for landslide risk management. The time series of cumulative displacement was divided into a trend term and a periodic term using the Hodrick-Prescott (HP) filter method. The polynomial model was used to predict the trend term. The extreme learning machine (ELM) and least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) were chosen to predict the periodic term. In the prediction model for the periodic term, input variables based on the effects of rainfall and reservoir water level in landslide displacement were selected using grey relational analysis. Based on the results, the prediction precision of ELM is better than that of LS-SVM for predicting landslide displacement. The method for predicting landslide displacement could be applied by relevant authorities in making landslide emergency plans in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据