4.7 Article

Ultra-selective carbon molecular sieve membranes for natural gas separations based on a carbon-rich intrinsically microporous polyimide precursor

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 585, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.05.020

关键词

-

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [BAS/1/1323-01-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly contorted, carbon-rich intrinsically microporous polyimide (PIM-PI) made from spirobifluorene dianhydride and 3,3-dimethylnaphthidine (SBFDA-DMN) was employed as a precursor for the formation of carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membranes at pyrolysis temperatures from 550 to 1000 degrees C. The high carbon content of SBFDA-DMN (similar to 84%) resulted in only 28% total weight loss during pyrolysis under a nitrogen atmosphere at 1000 degrees C. The development of the various microstructural textures was characterized by gas sorption analysis, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, electrical conductivity, and gas transport properties. Heat treatment of a pristine SBFDA-DMN membrane at 550 degrees C resulted in reduced permeability for all gases (e.g.: P-CO2 dropped from 4700 to 1500 barrer) as well as lower BET surface area from 621 to 545 m(2) g(-1). At 600 degrees C, new pores induced by pyrolysis increased the BET surface area to nearly that of the precursor and significantly improved gas separation performance. Above 600 degrees C, a progressive collapse of the micropores became evident with CMS membranes showing higher gas-pair selectivity but lower permeability. At 1000 degrees C, ultra-micropores comparable in size with the kinetic diameter of CH4 emerged and induced a prominent molecular sieving effect resulting in very high CH4 rejection. This strong size exclusion effect, further supported by gravimetric gas sorption measurements, resulted in unusually high N-2/CH4 and CO2/CH4 selectivities of 35 and 1475, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据