4.6 Article

Predicting Dynamic Shear Modulus of Asphalt Mastics Using Discretized-Element Simulation and Reinforcement Mechanisms

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002831

关键词

Asphalt mastics; Dynamic shear modulus; Discrete-element simulation; Micromechanical model; Reinforcement mechanism

资金

  1. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBJJ1841]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201706090166]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878164]
  4. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation [BK20161421]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic shear modulus of an asphalt mastic has a remarkable effect on the mechanical performance of an asphalt pavement, and particulate composite micromechanical models are proven to be suitable for the prediction of modulus of asphalt mastics. However, the prediction accuracy of the current micromechanical models decreases sharply at a high filler concentration and high temperature (or low frequency). This study aims to develop a modified micromechanical model that can be applied to predict modulus of asphalt mastics at a wide range of frequencies and filler concentrations. Dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) tests are performed using asphalt mastics with four filler concentrations, and three-dimensional discrete-element method (DEM) is implemented to validate the DSR tests and obtain additional master curves of asphalt mastics with different filler concentrations. The reinforcement mechanisms are introduced into the micromechanical models to predict the laboratory test results with an increase of the prediction accuracy. The numerical results show that the test data is repeated by the DEM simulation, which is believed to be a promising tool to present the rheological behavior of asphalt matrix and asphalt mastics. The modified micromechanical viscoelastic model can predict the dynamic shear modulus of asphalt mastics successfully at high filler concentration and low frequency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据