4.7 Article

Simultaneously implement of both weak magnetic field and aeration for ciprofloxacin removal by Fenton-like reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 776-784

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.045

关键词

Aeration; ciprofloxacin; Fenton; Nano zero-valent iron (NZVI); Weak magnetic field

资金

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [95014379]
  2. Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences [96349]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the ability of heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction (nano zero-valent iron (NZVI)/H2O2) in combination with weak magnetic field (WMF) under continuous oxygen supply by air bubbling for pollutant abatement (using ciprofloxacin as a model pollutant). The considered operating variables were initial pH, catalyst dosage, reaction time and different intensities of magnetic field. Results indicated that NZVI/H2O2/aeration/weak magnetic field could effectively decompose ciprofloxacin at neutral condition and higher removal rates are observed at higher pH and NZVI concentrations. Superimposing a weak magnetic field leads to 20% enhancement in ciprofloxacin removal by catalytic Fenton under aeration condition. Employing simultaneously magnetic field induction and aeration exhibit excellent capability to the NZVI oxidation and significantly increased the dissolution rate of iron. Based on Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, transformation products of NZVI are Fe3O4 and FeO(OH). The faster mass transport due to Lorentz and field gradient force, more oxygen diffusion to the iron surface and promoted electrochemical reactions results in more OH degrees production. Generation of weak magnetic field by permanent magnets and using aeration for both mixing and in situ oxygen supply significantly enhanced the Fenton reaction performance. This combination technology doesn't need any energy input and costly chemicals hence can be used easily for wastewater treatment applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据