期刊
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 408-415出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1556264619869538
关键词
paying research participants; research ethics; institutional review boards
资金
- National Institutes of Health [3R01AI114617-03S1]
Along with a dearth of regulatory guidance, little empirical research has examined factors related to participant payment in research. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 100 institutional review board (IRB)-approved sociobehavioral human subjects research protocols at a large research university in Southern California. The proportion of studies that paid participants differed significantly by type of research (p < .001) and study population (p = .009). The average payment amount also differed significantly by study population (p < .001) and type of participation (in-person vs. remote; p < .001). In addition, studies that required more visits (p < .001) and more time (p = .011) paid significantly more than studies with fewer and shorter visits, respectively. These findings provide data to help inform future ethical payment practices.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据