4.4 Article

Gastric Lesion Classification Using Deep Learning Based on Fast and Robust Fuzzy C-Means and Simple Linear Iterative Clustering Superpixel Algorithms

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 2549-2556

出版社

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s42835-019-00259-x

关键词

Gastric disease; Computer aided diagnosis; CADx; Endoscopy; Deep learning; Inception module

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2017R1E1A1A03070297]
  2. MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program [IITP-2019-2018-0-01433]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1E1A1A03070297] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric diseases are a common medical issue; they can be detected using endoscopy equipment. Computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems can help internists identify gastric diseases more accurately. In this paper, we present a CADx system that can detect and classify gastric diseases such as gastric polyps, gastric ulcers, gastritis, and cancer. The system uses a deep learning model as a GoogLeNet based on an Inception module. The fast and robust fuzzy C-means (FRFCM) and simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) superpixel algorithms are applied for image segmentation during preprocessing. The FRFCM algorithm, which is based on morphological reconstruction and membership filtering, is much faster and more robust than fuzzy C-means. In addition, the SLIC superpixel algorithm adapts the k-means clustering method to efficiently generate superpixels. These two approaches produce a feasible method of classifying normal and abnormal gastric lesions. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.85 and 0.87 for normal and abnormal lesions, respectively. The proposed CADx system also performs reliably.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据