4.4 Article

Competitive grain growth and dendrite morphology evolution in selective laser melting of Inconel 718 superalloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 521, 期 -, 页码 15-29

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.05.027

关键词

Selective laser melting; Phase field; Stray grain; Inconel 718; Solidification simulation; Competitive growth

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1563002]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1563002] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microstructure control is a great challenge for selective laser melting (SLM) mainly because of nonuniform and ultra-rapid heating and cooling in the process. It is related to the control of dendrite morphology evolution and competitive grain growth by adjusting the process parameters of SLM. In this study, a multiscale simulation approach, which combines the finite element method (FEM) and the phase field (PF) method, is performed to investigate the dendrite morphology and stray grain growth under various SLM parameters for Inconel 718 superalloy. The cooling characteristics of melt pool, including the cooling rate, thermal gradient/solidification ratio (G/R), and the slope of the solidification front are investigated. Meanwhile, experiment verification adopting the manufacturing parameters identical to the simulation is performed. It is shown that simultaneously increasing or decreasing the laser power and scan speed leads to a drastic change of melt pool aspect ratio (MPAR), and this in turn affects the competitive growth of stray grains. Overall, a larger MPAR is found to suppress the growth of stray grains more effectively. Also, the experimental results are found to agree well with the simulation results. Three mechanisms of stray grain growth are revealed from the simulation results, and their roles are analzyed. This study provides important insights into the microstructure control in the laser additive manufacturing processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据