4.7 Article

Waste cigarette filter as nanofibrous membranes for on-demand immiscible oil/water mixtures and emulsions separation

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 114-122

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.04.057

关键词

Electrospinning; Underwater superoleophobicity; Underoil superhydrophobicity; On-demand; Oil/water separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [5187021715]
  2. Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation of China [161044]
  3. Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Gansu Province, China [181R3RA083]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110025, 2017M610031]
  5. Yong Teacher Research Group Foundation of Northwest Normal University [NWNU-LKQN-16-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid industrial growth and the frequent oil spill accidents have led to the large production of oily wastewater. Thus, it is urging to develop a low-cost and eco-friendly material to purify the oily wastewater. In our work, the waste cigarette filter as the raw material was used to prepare cigarette filter coated meshes (CFCMs) by a facile electrospinning approach. The as-prepared CFCMs prewetted with water or oil achieved the special wetting performance of underwater superoleophobicity or underoil superhydrophobicity without any further chemical modification. Hence, the cigarette filter coated meshes with larger or smaller pore size can be applied to on-demand immiscible oil/water mixtures (light or heavy oil/water mixtures) and oil/water emulsions separation (water-in-oil or oil-in-water emulsions), respectively. Moreover, the CFCMs still exhibited high separation efficiency larger than 99.9% for immiscible oil/water mixtures and emulsions after many cyclic testing. The work provides an application in oil/water separation for waste cigarette filters and contributes to reduce the pollution for environment from the waste cigarette filters. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据