4.2 Article

Construction of Integrated Evaluation System for Green Port Construction Based on BIM Technology

期刊

JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 1073-1079

出版社

COASTAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.2112/SI93-155.1

关键词

BIM technology; green port; construction; integrated evaluation; system construction

资金

  1. China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd. [18-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of integrated construction of green port construction is evaluated accurately and effectively, and the sustainable development level of green port construction is further improved. An evaluation model of integrated construction effect of green port construction based on BIM construction information is put forward. The green building feature information mining model of green port construction integration construction effect is constructed, the index of green port construction integration construction effect evaluation is constructed by using multi-parameter joint recurrent analysis modeling method, and the correlation evaluation and detection of green port construction integration construction effect is carried out by using association rule analysis method. The rough set quantitative evaluation model is used to calculate the global optimal solution of the green port construction integration construction effect evaluation, to improve the adaptability of the green port construction integration construction effect evaluation, to extract the statistical characteristic quantity of the green port construction integration construction effect, and to realize the construction of the green port construction integration evaluation system. Big data analysis is carried out by using SPSS software. The results of empirical analysis show that the confidence level of the integrated construction effect evaluation of green port construction using this model is high, and the reliability of the integrated evaluation system of green port construction is better.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据