4.8 Article

The alveolar immune cell landscape is dysregulated in checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 129, 期 10, 页码 4305-4315

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI128654

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH HL132055, HL131812]
  2. Department of Defense [DoDW81XWH-16-1-0510]
  3. Bloombergsimilar toKimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a highly morbid complication of immune checkpoint immunotherapy (ICI), one which precludes the continuation of ICI. Yet, the mechanistic underpinnings of CIP are unknown. METHODS. To better understand the mechanism of lung injury in CIP, we prospectively collected bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples in ICI-treated patients with (n = 12) and without CIP (n = 6), prior to initiating first-line therapy for CIP (high-dose corticosteroids). We analyzed BAL immune cell populations using a combination of traditional multicolor flow cytometry gating, unsupervised clustering analysis, and BAL supernatant cytokine measurements. RESULTS. We found increased BAL lymphocytosis, predominantly CD4(+) T cells, in patients with CIP. Specifically, we observed increased numbers of BAL central memory T cells, evidence of type I polarization, and decreased expression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 in BAL Tregs, suggesting both activation of proinflammatory subsets and an attenuated suppressive phenotype. CIP BAL myeloid immune populations displayed enhanced expression of IL-1 beta and decreased expression of counterregulatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. We observed increased levels of T-cell chemoattractants in the BAL supernatant, consistent with our proinflammatory, lymphocytic cellular landscape. CONCLUSION. We observe several immune cell subpopulations that are dysregulated in CIP, which may represent possible targets that could lead to therapeutics for this morbid immune-related adverse event.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据