4.8 Article

Fbxw7 increases CCL2/7 in CX3CR1hi macrophages to promote intestinal inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 129, 期 9, 页码 3877-3893

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI123374

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771699, 31870907, 81571524]
  2. National Program on Key Basic Research Project [2014CB542101]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [Z19H100001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resident and inflammatory mononuclear phagocytes (MPhs) with functional plasticity in the intestine are critically involved in the pathology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), the mechanism of which remains incompletely understood. In the present study, we found that increased expression of the E3 ligase F-box and WO repeat domain-containing 7 (FBXW) in the inflamed intestine was significantly correlated with IBD severity in both human diseases and in mouse models. Myeloid Fbxw7 deficiency protected mice from colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate (OSS) or 2,6,4-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS). Fbxw7 deficiency resulted in decreased production of the chemokines CCL2 and CCL7 by colonic CX3CR1(hi) resident macrophages and reduced the accumulation of CX3CR1(int) proinflammatory MPhs in colitis-affected colon tissue. Mice that received adeno-associated virus-shFbxw7 (AAV-shFbxw7) showed significantly improved survival rates and alleviation of colitis. Mechanism screening demonstrated that FBXW7 suppressed H3K27me3 modification and promoted CcI2 and CcI7 expression via degradation of the histone-lysine N-methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) in macrophages. Taken together, our results indicate that FBXW7 degrades EZH2 and increases CcI2 and CcI7 in CX3CR1(hi) macrophages, thereby promoting the recruitment of CX3CR1(int) proinflammatory MPhs into local colon tissues with colitis. Targeting FBXW7 might represent a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of intestinal inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据