4.7 Article

Potential for mine water disposal in coal seam goaf: Investigation of storage coefficients in the Shendong mining area

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118646

关键词

Underground reservoir; Mine water; Coal seam; Storage coefficient; Fluid-solid coupling; Water resource

资金

  1. Open Fund of Chinese State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining [SHJT-16-30.3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water resource shortages and coal mine water disposal create major challenges faced by Northwest China. This study investigated the idea of building underground reservoirs in coal seam goaf after coal mining activities in support of water resource protection and use. Several underground reservoirs have already been successfully constructed in the Shendong mining area. To inform reservoir construction, a mathematical fluid-solid coupling model was developed for calculating the storage coefficient and reservoir volume. Moreover, the effects of different physical parameters on the underground reservoirs were investigated. In addition, the storage coefficient of the Shendong mining area was calculated, which can contribute to site selection for future water storage facility development in that area. The results show that the rock bulking coefficient and mining height all have significant effects on the storage coefficient, in terms of uncertainty analysis. The storage coefficients in the Shendong mining area ranged from 12.80% to 33.80% (mean 22.30%). The total water storage for 18 typical underground reservoirs is 1857 x 10(4) m(3). The utilization ratio of mine water could increase from less than 25% to more than 90%. The highest storage coefficients for underground reservoirs would be in the boundary region of the Shendong mining area. The presented approach is helpful for improving mine water use and environmental protection and has broad application prospects. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据